The Omission of Traditional Indian Eras in Mainstream History
During my recent translation of two Sanskrit works by the 20th-century Kerala poet Kesavapandita into Telugu, I encountered a reference to the year 1100 of the Kolabhya Era. Seeking clarity on this obscure timeline, I consulted Prof. Rani Sadasivamurty, Vice-Chancellor of Sri Venkateswara Vedic University (Veda Viswavidyalaya), Tirupati. He graciously provided a comprehensive list of traditional Indian Sakas (Eras), including the Kalachuri Era (currently in its 2079th year) and the Valabhi Era (in its 1702nd year).
A deeper examination reveals a profound succession of historical eras native to Bharat, many of which are documented extensively in the monumental historical research Kali Saka Vignanam by the late scholar Sri Kota Venkatachalam. These include:
-
Yudhishthira Saka: Marking the coronation of Emperor Yudhishthira in 3138 BCE, precisely 36 years before the onset of the Kaliyuga.
-
Jayabhyudaya Saka: Commencing in 3102 BCE, signaling the period when the composition of the Mahabharata began.
-
Kali Saka: The formal beginning of the Kali Age in 3102 BCE.
-
General/Laukika Saka: Commencing immediately after Sri Krishna concluded his earthly incarnation.
-
Yudhishthira Kala (Saptarshi Timeline): A specific historical reckoning marked at 3076 BCE, exactly 26 years after the start of the Kali Era.
-
Saptarshi Saka (Era of the Seven Sages): An ancient astronomical and historical timeline tied closely to the Yudhishthira period.
-
Vikrama Samvat: The era established by Emperor Vikramaditya in 57 BCE.
-
Salivahana Saka: The widely recognized era commencing in 78 CE (corresponding to year 3180 of the Kali chronology).
All of these distinct chronological systems belong inherently to the heritage of Bharat. The very existence of an era named after a historical figure stands as undeniable proof of their monumental impact and leadership. If the foundational names behind these long-standing timelines are completely untraced and ignored in modern textbooks, our recorded national narrative cannot be considered a complete history.